[Solved] Week 3 MGMT618

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

Workplace scenario involving an observed unethical

**files (2)**

– ## Week3MGTM618.docx

– ## RubricAssessment-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf

**## Week3MGTM618.docx**

**Assignment Directions**

This assignment assesses
[CO-3 [content page]](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/845621/topics/19503525).

Students will provide a workplace scenario involving an observed unethical practice.

**Submission Instructions:**

Write a 5–7 page report analyzing the situation, evaluating potential responses, and recommending the most ethically sound course of action.

**Requirements:** Use at least 3 peer-reviewed sources from the past 5 years. Follow APA format.

**Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

· We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
[Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

· Assignment Rubric

· If you do not see the rubric,
**select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

·
[Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

**## RubricAssessment-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT HRMT Discussion Rubric
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Content / 4040 points

Valid con-

nections to

course con-

tent are

made. Posts

are complete

with analysis

and insight.

Critical

thinking is

evident.

Original

ideas are

presented.

All aspects

of the dis-

cussion

question are

completely

answered.

34 points

Some con-

nections are

made, al-

though some

are confus-

ing or under-

developed.

Analysis of

content is

evident, al-

though in-

complete.

Critical

thinking and

knowledge

of content

are not

clearly

articulated.

30 points

Limited con-

nections

made to

course con-

tent. Limited

analysis or

individual in-

sight. Critical

thinking is

not present.

Lacks

originality.

26 points

No evidence

of critical

thinking.

Little origi-

nality evi-

dent.

Content is

vague.

0 points

Not at-

tempted or

provided.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Participati

on in

Learning

Communit

y

/ 30

Format-

Grammar-

Spelling-

Punctuati

on

/ 20

30 points

Responses

are substan-

tive and en-

courage dis-

cussion by

proposing a

different

point of view

supported by

an attribu-

tion to a

source, per-

sonal exam-

ple, or per-

sonal appli-

cation. All re-

sponses in-

clude related

follow up

questions to

promote

continued

discussion.

25.5 points

Posts meet

the require-

ments but

lack substan-

tive engage-

ment with

the topic,

classmates,

or professor.

All required

postings are

made.

Responses

contribute to

a substantive

discussion by

introducing

new ideas,

building on

the topic of

the post, or

posting fol-

low up

questions.

22.5 points

Responses

mostly sum-

marize or re-

state the

comments of

others or of

the original

post – not

substantive

or aimed at

moving the

discussion

forward.

Opinions and

conclusions

are not

supported.

19.5 points

Only one

participation

post, and/or

responses

are short

statements

such as “I

agree

with…,” “I

like this

post,” or

“Great job!”

0 points

No replies

provided.

20 points

No spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is

easy to un-

derstand and

well-written.

17 points

Very few

spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is in

proper

format.

15 points

Several spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is confusing

in some

areas.

13 points

Many spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is difficult to

understand.

0 points

Writing is

incompre-

hensible.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Timelines

s

/ 1010 points

Initial discus-

sion posted

by the noted

due date.

(Week one

initial post is

due Sunday

and all other

weeks due

by Thursday

at 11:55 PM

EST. Replies

are due by

11:55 PM on

Sunday.)

8.5 points

Initial post or

replies to

classmates

are submit-

ted after the

required due

date (1 day

late).

7.5 points

Initial posts

or replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 2

days late).

6.5 points

Initial post or

replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 3

days late).

0 points

Failed to

submit initial

post or

replies by

due date.

Exemplary
90 points
minimum

Accomplished
80 points
minimum

Developing
70 points
minimum

Beginning
60 points
minimum

Did Not

Attempt
0 points minimum

**## RubricAssessment-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT HRMT Discussion Rubric
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Content / 4040 points

Valid con-

nections to

course con-

tent are

made. Posts

are complete

with analysis

and insight.

Critical

thinking is

evident.

Original

ideas are

presented.

All aspects

of the dis-

cussion

question are

completely

answered.

34 points

Some con-

nections are

made, al-

though some

are confus-

ing or under-

developed.

Analysis of

content is

evident, al-

though in-

complete.

Critical

thinking and

knowledge

of content

are not

clearly

articulated.

30 points

Limited con-

nections

made to

course con-

tent. Limited

analysis or

individual in-

sight. Critical

thinking is

not present.

Lacks

originality.

26 points

No evidence

of critical

thinking.

Little origi-

nality evi-

dent.

Content is

vague.

0 points

Not at-

tempted or

provided.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Participati

on in

Learning

Communit

y

/ 30

Format-

Grammar-

Spelling-

Punctuati

on

/ 20

30 points

Responses

are substan-

tive and en-

courage dis-

cussion by

proposing a

different

point of view

supported by

an attribu-

tion to a

source, per-

sonal exam-

ple, or per-

sonal appli-

cation. All re-

sponses in-

clude related

follow up

questions to

promote

continued

discussion.

25.5 points

Posts meet

the require-

ments but

lack substan-

tive engage-

ment with

the topic,

classmates,

or professor.

All required

postings are

made.

Responses

contribute to

a substantive

discussion by

introducing

new ideas,

building on

the topic of

the post, or

posting fol-

low up

questions.

22.5 points

Responses

mostly sum-

marize or re-

state the

comments of

others or of

the original

post – not

substantive

or aimed at

moving the

discussion

forward.

Opinions and

conclusions

are not

supported.

19.5 points

Only one

participation

post, and/or

responses

are short

statements

such as “I

agree

with…,” “I

like this

post,” or

“Great job!”

0 points

No replies

provided.

20 points

No spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is

easy to un-

derstand and

well-written.

17 points

Very few

spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is in

proper

format.

15 points

Several spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is confusing

in some

areas.

13 points

Many spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is difficult to

understand.

0 points

Writing is

incompre-

hensible.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Timelines

s

/ 1010 points

Initial discus-

sion posted

by the noted

due date.

(Week one

initial post is

due Sunday

and all other

weeks due

by Thursday

at 11:55 PM

EST. Replies

are due by

11:55 PM on

Sunday.)

8.5 points

Initial post or

replies to

classmates

are submit-

ted after the

required due

date (1 day

late).

7.5 points

Initial posts

or replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 2

days late).

6.5 points

Initial post or

replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 3

days late).

0 points

Failed to

submit initial

post or

replies by

due date.

Exemplary
90 points
minimum

Accomplished
80 points
minimum

Developing
70 points
minimum

Beginning
60 points
minimum

Did Not

Attempt
0 points minimum

**## Week3MGTM618.docx**

**Assignment Directions**

This assignment assesses
[CO-3 [content page]](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/845621/topics/19503525).

Students will provide a workplace scenario involving an observed unethical practice.

**Submission Instructions:**

Write a 5–7 page report analyzing the situation, evaluating potential responses, and recommending the most ethically sound course of action.

**Requirements:** Use at least 3 peer-reviewed sources from the past 5 years. Follow APA format.

**Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

· We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
[Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

· Assignment Rubric

· If you do not see the rubric,
**select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

·
[Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

**## RubricAssessment-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT HRMT Discussion Rubric
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Content / 4040 points

Valid con-

nections to

course con-

tent are

made. Posts

are complete

with analysis

and insight.

Critical

thinking is

evident.

Original

ideas are

presented.

All aspects

of the dis-

cussion

question are

completely

answered.

34 points

Some con-

nections are

made, al-

though some

are confus-

ing or under-

developed.

Analysis of

content is

evident, al-

though in-

complete.

Critical

thinking and

knowledge

of content

are not

clearly

articulated.

30 points

Limited con-

nections

made to

course con-

tent. Limited

analysis or

individual in-

sight. Critical

thinking is

not present.

Lacks

originality.

26 points

No evidence

of critical

thinking.

Little origi-

nality evi-

dent.

Content is

vague.

0 points

Not at-

tempted or

provided.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Participati

on in

Learning

Communit

y

/ 30

Format-

Grammar-

Spelling-

Punctuati

on

/ 20

30 points

Responses

are substan-

tive and en-

courage dis-

cussion by

proposing a

different

point of view

supported by

an attribu-

tion to a

source, per-

sonal exam-

ple, or per-

sonal appli-

cation. All re-

sponses in-

clude related

follow up

questions to

promote

continued

discussion.

25.5 points

Posts meet

the require-

ments but

lack substan-

tive engage-

ment with

the topic,

classmates,

or professor.

All required

postings are

made.

Responses

contribute to

a substantive

discussion by

introducing

new ideas,

building on

the topic of

the post, or

posting fol-

low up

questions.

22.5 points

Responses

mostly sum-

marize or re-

state the

comments of

others or of

the original

post – not

substantive

or aimed at

moving the

discussion

forward.

Opinions and

conclusions

are not

supported.

19.5 points

Only one

participation

post, and/or

responses

are short

statements

such as “I

agree

with…,” “I

like this

post,” or

“Great job!”

0 points

No replies

provided.

20 points

No spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is

easy to un-

derstand and

well-written.

17 points

Very few

spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is in

proper

format.

15 points

Several spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is confusing

in some

areas.

13 points

Many spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is difficult to

understand.

0 points

Writing is

incompre-

hensible.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Timelines

s

/ 1010 points

Initial discus-

sion posted

by the noted

due date.

(Week one

initial post is

due Sunday

and all other

weeks due

by Thursday

at 11:55 PM

EST. Replies

are due by

11:55 PM on

Sunday.)

8.5 points

Initial post or

replies to

classmates

are submit-

ted after the

required due

date (1 day

late).

7.5 points

Initial posts

or replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 2

days late).

6.5 points

Initial post or

replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 3

days late).

0 points

Failed to

submit initial

post or

replies by

due date.

Exemplary
90 points
minimum

Accomplished
80 points
minimum

Developing
70 points
minimum

Beginning
60 points
minimum

Did Not

Attempt
0 points minimum

**## Week3MGTM618.docx**

**Assignment Directions**

This assignment assesses
[CO-3 [content page]](https://myclassroom.apus.edu/d2l/le/lessons/845621/topics/19503525).

Students will provide a workplace scenario involving an observed unethical practice.

**Submission Instructions:**

Write a 5–7 page report analyzing the situation, evaluating potential responses, and recommending the most ethically sound course of action.

**Requirements:** Use at least 3 peer-reviewed sources from the past 5 years. Follow APA format.

**Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

· We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
[Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

· Assignment Rubric

· If you do not see the rubric,
**select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

·
[Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

**## RubricAssessment-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT HRMT Discussion Rubric
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Content / 4040 points

Valid con-

nections to

course con-

tent are

made. Posts

are complete

with analysis

and insight.

Critical

thinking is

evident.

Original

ideas are

presented.

All aspects

of the dis-

cussion

question are

completely

answered.

34 points

Some con-

nections are

made, al-

though some

are confus-

ing or under-

developed.

Analysis of

content is

evident, al-

though in-

complete.

Critical

thinking and

knowledge

of content

are not

clearly

articulated.

30 points

Limited con-

nections

made to

course con-

tent. Limited

analysis or

individual in-

sight. Critical

thinking is

not present.

Lacks

originality.

26 points

No evidence

of critical

thinking.

Little origi-

nality evi-

dent.

Content is

vague.

0 points

Not at-

tempted or

provided.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Participati

on in

Learning

Communit

y

/ 30

Format-

Grammar-

Spelling-

Punctuati

on

/ 20

30 points

Responses

are substan-

tive and en-

courage dis-

cussion by

proposing a

different

point of view

supported by

an attribu-

tion to a

source, per-

sonal exam-

ple, or per-

sonal appli-

cation. All re-

sponses in-

clude related

follow up

questions to

promote

continued

discussion.

25.5 points

Posts meet

the require-

ments but

lack substan-

tive engage-

ment with

the topic,

classmates,

or professor.

All required

postings are

made.

Responses

contribute to

a substantive

discussion by

introducing

new ideas,

building on

the topic of

the post, or

posting fol-

low up

questions.

22.5 points

Responses

mostly sum-

marize or re-

state the

comments of

others or of

the original

post – not

substantive

or aimed at

moving the

discussion

forward.

Opinions and

conclusions

are not

supported.

19.5 points

Only one

participation

post, and/or

responses

are short

statements

such as “I

agree

with…,” “I

like this

post,” or

“Great job!”

0 points

No replies

provided.

20 points

No spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is

easy to un-

derstand and

well-written.

17 points

Very few

spelling,

punctuation,

or grammar

errors.

Content is in

proper

format.

15 points

Several spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is confusing

in some

areas.

13 points

Many spell-

ing, punctua-

tion, or

grammar er-

rors. Content

is difficult to

understand.

0 points

Writing is

incompre-

hensible.

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did Not
Attempt

Criterion
Score

Timelines

s

/ 1010 points

Initial discus-

sion posted

by the noted

due date.

(Week one

initial post is

due Sunday

and all other

weeks due

by Thursday

at 11:55 PM

EST. Replies

are due by

11:55 PM on

Sunday.)

8.5 points

Initial post or

replies to

classmates

are submit-

ted after the

required due

date (1 day

late).

7.5 points

Initial posts

or replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 2

days late).

6.5 points

Initial post or

replies are

submitted

after the re-

quired due

date (i.e., 3

days late).

0 points

Failed to

submit initial

post or

replies by

due date.

Exemplary
90 points
minimum

Accomplished
80 points
minimum

Developing
70 points
minimum

Beginning
60 points
minimum

Did Not

Attempt
0 points minimum