What were the specific events that forced action on the part of the “Rebels” in regards to the tea on board ship at Griffin’s wharf, including the governor’s actions? Were the Bostonians justified in their actions or should they have pursued other means to resolve the conflict over the tea, and if you believe that the actions of the citizens of Boston were precipitant, describe in detail what they should have done and what would be the hopeful results of this alternative to dumping the tea into the harbor? If your position is that the Bostonians were justified in their actions, describe in specific detail why the “Boston Tea Party” was justified. Remember to take into consideration the reaction of the British Government against the port of Boston, and Massachusetts, with the Coercive Acts.
What were the specific events that forced action on the part of the “Rebels” in regards…
What were the specific events that forced action on the part of the "Rebels" in regards to the tea on board ship at Griffin's wharf, including the governor's actions? Were the...
