Learning, appropriating knowledge in our culture has ceased to be the imperative obligation to…

Learning, appropriating knowledge in our culture has ceased to be the imperative obligation to repeat data, concepts and information provided by a higher authority (teacher, books approved by accredited authorities, etc.) The world can no longer be divided among those who know and those who don’t know. We have given some examples. Write your opinion and justify it for each of these examples…
– Young people aged 19, 20, 21 left to their own devices, left for dead who must manage to create new knowledge and make decisions with it in order to survive.
– Citizens, ordinary people, who distance themselves from politicians who say they know because they have data that most do not.
– Doctors who treat their patients as ignorant and make decisions without consulting them.
– Professors who feel superior because they are supposed to have academic titles, years of study and recognition that lead them to look with pride and contempt on their students. What importance do we give to new technologies for the access and creation of new knowledge? Has access, within the reach of anyone with a smartphone, democratized access to knowledge?
– Parents who do not take into account the opinion of their children in decisions that concern them.
Thinking cannot be repeating the knowledge of others but inventing. Unlock the full potential of intelligence, intuition, innovation. The computer is the best of inventiveness filters. His colossal knowledge goes out to meet our now learned ignorance, clarifies it, refines it, and purifies it. Is it appropriate for a school to disallow students from using their smartphones?